After exploring the web on the search for Canadian BMX companies and distros, I came across Seshin's site. The Nova-Scotia based company apparently was having a big sale on all their '08 overstock, and amongst their product selection(which features a thong... I mean even
Animal hasn't done a thong yet!), I found some pretty inexpensive bars, the Chilkos. At 29.99$CAD (roughly 24$USD at current exchange rates)... they were pretty cheap, and with some money just dormant in my Paypal account, I couldn't resist, I snagged a pair.

There's only one problem: the damned things are ENORMOUS! At 28.5 inches wide and with 8.125 inches of rise, this is the total opposite of what I am used to. I can't recall if I have explained this in a previous post, but we have kind of a counter-culture going on here in Trois-Rivieres. While the rest of the trend-whores of the globe are turning to bars that can't fit in a doorway, we trifluvians are obsessed with running our bars as short as is possible. We aren't immune to the brakeless trend though, as kids have been known to rip their brakes off their bikes in order to grind their bars the additional half inch that the brake lever takes up. The brave few who decide to run brakes anyways go to extreme lengths to run their bars as short as their brakeless comrads: flanges are always cut, sometimes even with a part of the grip, and brake levers are seldom seen not mounted on the bar bend. Enventually, frustrated with not being able to run their handles 21 inchers like everybody else, most of the brake-bearers give up and go brakeless, making their purchase of ultra-lite brakes a total waste within a few short weeks.
As a result of this trend, every single "freestyle" rider, wether his wheels are 20, 24, or 26 inch in diameter (we don't have freestyle fixies here yet so no 29), regardless of the said riders ages, stature or riding experience, has short bars and no brakes. This produces some interesting (and sometimes hazardeous) combinations which I will try to document in the future. While I am sorry to admit that I have been brainwashed into sporting some pretty short bars (my current ones are 23 inches), I have been kind of resilient at going brakeless.
With the Chilko's ordered, I had two choices: either cut them down to get a pair of reasonably sized bars on which I could mount some brakes and use everyday, or make my purchase an experiment on the behalf of all the big bar skeptics. Having nothing else to do, I decided that the time was ripe for testing out the excuse that giant-handlebar lovers always give when one critiques his bars. As soon as I had the bars in my possession, I immediately stuck on some fresh grips with some hairspray (hairspray being a brake deterrent, making impossible to mount a lever without cutting a new pair of 15$ grips), and made them my dedicated brakeless bars, for those moments where I really feel like being a trend whore.
After minimal testing on flat ground (parks are still frozen solid), turns out that big bars DO give you an increased sense of control. This is specially true in rotations: I quickly found myself grossly over-rotating my 180's when using the technique I had with my smaller bars. It must be a leverage thing. Sadly, with my bike geometry (20.75 TT) and relatively long legs, bar movements are greatly restricted, making x-ups, barspins and tabletops close to impossible. But hey, it's not like I'm used to barspinning all the time.
What I really did like with having bigger handles is the increased height of the bars. Being a tall, lanky person, it did my back wonders to have my hands an inch and a half higher. Less back fatigue means less downtime and more riding, which makes me pretty happy. Now if they could only make a pair of 8x23 with a small enough crossbar to run some brakes...
All that said, I really don't think that big bar enthousiasts need to be condemned for liking their handles wider. Sure, extreme cases look ridiculous and deserve a laugh, but in the end, who gives a flying crap if you're running some uncut Lumberjacks? I sure as hell don't. Not that I don't like debates... the techie part of me likes discussing numbers and their effects on things, and I'm sure I'm not the only rider who enjoys arguments on such things, I'd even go as far as to say that it's a part of what makes our sport interesting. Such controversy happens in any discipline anyways. Hey, if the buzz the arguments generate can help keep the interest for BMX alive, then I'm all for.